Surveillance of Transfusion Complications

Surveillance of the blood system is a key tool for ensuring safety of the blood supply. It involves monitoring adverse events so that risks and trends can be identified early and appropriately managed. Related terms are hemovigilance (e.g., France, Canada - Transfusion Transmitted Infection Surveillance System - TTISS), medical-event reporting system for transfusion medicine (MERS-TM, USA), serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT, Britain) and adverse events reporting systems (See Further Reading).

Surveillance can be applied to monitoring adverse events, to include transmissible diseases, accidents and errors, near-misses, transfusion reactions, and any complication of transfusion. Surveillance involves integrating surveillance information on donors and recipients into an integrated database, as well as monitoring international trends that affect blood safety. Surveillance roles exist for hospital transfusion services, CBS, Health Canada.

Surveillance and reporting systems are based on the concept that an important component of preventing adverse events is the careful assessment of their incidence and root causes. To be effective, surveillance systems require a standardized confidential reporting system that avoids under-reporting and includes near misses.

Blood Surveillance

Health Canada has developed a national reporting system which will be used in all Canadian provinces/territories and CBS in 2004. One standardized form will be used to report to hospital transfusion services to CBS, provincial blood offices and Health Canada. The goals of the system are to provide timely information and data to support:

  • Assessments of the nature and magnitude of the risks associated with blood transfusion in Canada
  • Policy changes for
    - regulation of blood safety
    - preventative and corrective interventions
  • Identification of emerging threats to blood safety (enhanced ability via sentinel sites and special studies)
  • Identification of interventions to improve transfusion safety and appropriate use of blood and blood products

Implementation

Implementing the system will occur in three stages, each with a different scope:

Short term. The focus will be on adverse reactions to transfusion and the accident and errors that occur in hospitals (See Further Reading).

Intermediate term. Data collection and analysis will be extended to capture reactions to infusion of blood products that occur outside the hospital and establish electronic data linkages.

Long term. The system will capture information on delayed infectious complications to blood and blood products and will include information on the diagnosis, procedure, and indications for transfusion. Note: This is a short term deliverable for studies on high risk populations such as people with hemophilia, recipients of apheresis components, and bone marrow recipients.

Surveillance: Further Reading

Note: Canadian Blood Services offers no endorsement of and assumes no liability for the currency, accuracy, or availability of any information on these sites.

  1. Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. Br Med J 2000;320(7237):759-63.
  2. Barach P, Small SD. How the NHS can improve safety and learning. By learning free lessons from near misses (editorial). Br Med J 2000 Jun. 24;320(7251):1683-4.
  3. Bradbury M, Cruickshank JP. Blood transfusion: crucial steps in maintaining safe practice. Br J Nurs 2000 Feb. 10-23;9(3):134-8. [Medline]
  4. Callum JL, Kaplan HS, Merkley LL, Pinkerton PH, Rabin Fastman B, Romans RA, et al. Reporting of near-miss events for transfusion medicine: improving transfusion safety. Transfusion 2001 Oct.;41(10):1204-11. [ Full text ] [ Medline ]
  5. Kaplan HS, Callum JL, Fastman BR, Merkley LL. The medical event reporting system for transfusion medicine: Will it help get the right blood to the right patient? Transfus Med Rev. 2002 Apr.;16(2):86-102. [ Medline]
  6. Engelfriet CP, Reesink HW, Brand B, Levy G, Williamson LM, Menitove JE, et al. Haemovigilance systems. Vox Sang 1999;77(2):110-20.
  7. Faber JC. Haemovigilance in Europe: the European Haemovigilance Network. Transfus Clin Biol 2001 Jun.;8(3):285-90.
  8. Ibojie J, Urbaniak SJ. Comparing near misses with actual mistransfusion events: a more accurate reflection of transfusion errors. Br J Haematol 2000;108:458–60. [ Medline ]
  9. JCAHO. Sentinel events.
  10. JCAHO. Blood Transfusion Errors: Preventing Future Occurrences. Sentinel Event Alert. Issue 10 (Aug. 30, 1999).
  11. Kaplan HS, Battles JB, Van der Schaaf TW, Shea CE, Mercer SQ. Identification and classification of the causes of events in transfusion medicine. Transfusion 1998 Nov.-Dec.;38(11-12):1071-81. [ Medline ]
  12. Linden JV, Schmidt GB. An overview of state efforts to improve transfusion medicine: the New York State model. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999;123:482–5.
  13. Marconi M, Sirchia G. Increasing transfusion safety by reducing human error. Curr Opin Hematol 2000 Nov.;7(6):382-6. [ Medline ]
  14. Medical-event reporting system for transfusion medicine (MERS-TM).
  15. Pate B, Stajer R. The diagnosis and treatment of blame. J Healthc Qual 2001 Jan.-Feb.; 23(1): 4-8.
  16. Whitsett CF, Robichaux MG. Assessment of blood administration procedures: problems identified by direct observation and administrative incident reporting. Transfusion 2001;41:581-6. [ Full text ] [ Medline ]
  17. Williamson L, Cohen H, Love E, Jones H, Todd A, Soldan K. The Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) initiative: the UK approach to haemovigilance. Vox Sang 2000;78 Suppl 2:291-5.
  18. Williamson LM, Lowe S, Love EM, Cohen H, Soldan K, McClelland DB, et al. Serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) initiative: analysis of the first two annual reports. Br Med J 1999;319:16-9.
  19. Zimmermann R, Linhardt C, Weisbach V, Buscher M, Zingsem J, Eckstein R. An analysis of errors in blood component transfusion records with regard to quality improvement of data acquisition and to the performance of lookback and traceback procedures. Transfusion 1999 Apr.;39(4):351-6. [ Medline ]